Recent Movies

TRANSFORMERS 5 THE LAST KNIGHT (2017) - EXTENDED REVIEW

Humans and Transformers are at war, Optimus Prime is gone. The key to saving our future lies buried in the secrets of the past, in the hidden history of Transformers on Earth. 

Transformers: The Last Knight (2017)




Director:

Writers:

(screenplay), (screenplay) | 5 more credits »

Stars:

 

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

21 June 2017 (Philippines)  »

Also Known As:

Transformers: El último caballero
 
 
 
If you've the other transformers movies, then frankly, you have probably already seen this movie. My advice, this film's not worth seeing... at all. It is what is to be expected from a Michael Bay directed transformers movie: Explosions galore, painful and awkward humour, badly written characters, unfunny stereotypes, women included just for the sake of being hot, Optimus Prime is barely in this movie, shameless product placement, cluttered action sequences etc. But later on more about this. 
 
The good news about the latest Transformers movie is that — spoiler alert! — the world gets saved at the conclusion. The bad news is that it leaves the opportunity for more Transformers movies.
This profitable franchise has not exactly enjoyed critical praise since its first installment in 2007, and Transformers: The Last Knight is unlikely to change that. But bad reviews are unlikely to dissuade the series’ fans, who enjoy seeing lots of things blown up, with director Michael Bay once again happy to oblige. That the film required no less than six editors doesn't come as a surprise.
Anyone capable of explaining the near-incomprehensible storyline deserves a prize of some sort. Suffice it to say that the world is very much in peril; there are lots of large-scale battles involving robots good and bad; and Mark Wahlberg, who returns after making his first appearance in 2014’s Transformers: Age of Extinction, hasn’t forgone his rigorous exercise routine.

There’s no denying the narrative ambitions of the screenplay penned by three writers, with Akiva Goldsman contributing to the story. It includes a prologue set in the Middle Ages, with appearances by the Knights of the Round Table, a soused Merlin (an unrecognizable Stanley Tucci) and the Transformers, who apparently arrived on Earth a lot earlier than we thought. The action then shifts to the present day — or, as we’re helpfully informed, “1,600 years later” — with an English lord, Sir Edmond Burton (Anthony Hopkins), desperate to find an all-important talisman. Said mystical object just happens to wind up in the possession of Cade Yeager (Wahlberg), whose junkyard provides a perfect place for the Autobots to hang out.

Joined by such allies as Izabella (Isabel Moner), a plucky 14-year-old girl, and Viviane (Laura Haddock), a sexy Oxford professor, Cade goes about the business of trying to thwart the evil Megatron (Frank Welker). Although such Autobot allies as Bumblebee (Erik Aadahl), Hound (John Goodman), Hot Rod (Omar Sy), Drift (Ken Watanabe) and Daytrader (Steve Buscemi) pitch in to help, Optimus Prime (Peter Cullen) has gone AWOL. And when he finally does show up, he seems to be having an identity crisis.

Among the characters returning from previous installments are Colonel Lennox (Josh Duhamel), who makes the military look good, and Agent Simmons (John Turturro), now unhappily cooling his heels in Cuba. Newcomers include Cogman (Jim Carter), Sir Edmond’s personal robot, who bears a strong resemblance to C-3PO, and Cade’s friend Jimmy (Jerrod Carmichael), whose main purpose seems to be providing comic relief … a task at which he fails.  

The sprawling action includes a flashback depicting the Transformers battling Nazis and an explosive battle at Stonehenge that keeps you on the edge of your seat with concern for the ancient stones. And while there’s no shortage of large-scale set pieces, the storyline provides so many opportunities for attempts at droll humor, most of it involving Hopkins' dotty character, that the proceedings start to resemble drawing-room comedy. It’s all an overstuffed mess, but that was true of the previous entries as well, and audiences obviously don’t seem to mind.

 The camera work is absolutely awesome, each action sequences has no many different angles and slow motions, oh I have to correct myself here, super slow motion, which is something new, yes. But on the other each, and I mean literally each slow motion is power down to super slow motion that the movie has an explaination why we have 29 minutes over the extended usual cinema version. Michael Bay is addicted to make a movie to an epic screen-play, but here it is simply too much. The color grading is good, I liked the dark looks of the movie and also the creatures and autobots are darker than usual, if you compare the other parts before.

The setting is on the earth, in the past, in the future, in space, and so on, no spoiler here.

The music is epic, it is loud. The funny thing in the movie is that there two characters (not telling you who) who are making jokes about the epic kind of music, really cool idea by Bay.

I wanted to point out the outfits of some characters, most likely  leathered clothing girls and cool looking guys, as always in that frenchise, here we have old symbols again which was nice to see.

Stay seated until the very end of the movie because you will understand the message of the fifth part only if you stay seated, and you will have a surprise for sure.

I liked the dark sound of the movie, funny moments, it is action only, girls in leather, cars, robots, action and action, there are many sequences where you can close your eyes and after that in still inside of the storytelling, and the movie is describing itself. It is action and mainstream.

Wahlberg, as usual, gives it his all, although he’s already announced that he’s departing the series after this. Haddock makes for a fun, sexy foil, and Hopkins, who’s clearly entered the baroque phase of his career, seems to be having a great deal of fun — although every time he smiles, it seems less organic to his character and more about the new beach house he’s going to buy with the money he’s raking in. The movie is easy to understand, we always know what will come next. The jokes are not funny, but only sometimes, the epic without any end is tiring, the characters overall are totally under their value, I mean we don't get enough storytelling here and it is like there is no base to the audience. The settings are super crazy, may it be good or not. But again there were also 3 minutes of epic happiness. Watch it.

7.5/10 genre

3/10 overall


Thanks for reading and again the movie is made for cinemas and if you look for action only, you'll love it but if not, then you won't miss anything.
However, have fun watching Transformers 5, in cinemas now.
  

ONCE UPON A TIME IN VENICE (2017) - REVIEW

A Los Angeles detective seeks out the ruthless gang that stole his dog. 
 

Once Upon a Time in Venice (2017)

R-16 | | Action, Comedy, Thriller | 14 June 2017 (Philippines)   


 

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

14 June 2017 (Philippines)  »

Also Known As:

Going Under  »

Filming Locations:

 
 

Production Co:

 
Steve Ford (Bruce Willis) is a down but not out L.A based Private Investigator whose professional and personal worlds collide after his loving pet Buddy is stolen by a notorious gang. A series of crazy circumstances find him doing the gang's bidding, while being chased by two vengeful Samoan brothers, a loan shark's goons, and a few other shady characters. They say a dog is a man's best friend, and Steve shows how far a man will go to be reunited with him. 

Bruce Willis continues the “I don’t give a damn, write me a check” phase of his career with Once Upon a Time in Venice, a lame action-comedy directed by Mark Cullen, who, along with his co-screenwriting brother Robb, was previously responsible for the actor’s equal unfunny Cop Out. Playing a burned-out private eye based in Venice Beach, Willis subjects himself to various humiliations in a vain quest for laughs. These include skateboarding naked, sticking a revolver between his butt cheeks and wearing a dress and an Annie-style wig. Hilarity does not ensue.

The film seems to be going for a loose satirical vibe reminiscent of Robert Altman’s modern-day take on Philip Marlowe in The Long Goodbye. Sadly, there’s no comparison between that 1973 minor classic and this shaggy-dog tale which literally revolves around a stolen dog. And that’s the most compelling plot point.

The camera looks flat and nothing special, all the nice action movements which can turn a simple action movie into a blockbuster are not included in that movie.

The effects are also low standard and it seems like Willis and the production studio were bored so they created that movie.

The music is over the point and rock'n'roll from the 90s don't help at all.

The ramshackle storyline, which is superflat in fact, is basically an excuse for a series of would-be comic set pieces, none of which are particularly amusing. Willis at least seems more invested here than he has in recent projects — he’s not sleepwalking, for one thing — while Goodman appears to be having a blast and provides the film its best moments with his bemused line readings and facial expressions. He’s a prime example of the movie boasting more talent than it really deserves, with the cast also including such familiar faces as Famke Janssen, Christopher McDonald and Kal Penn, who plays a convenience store proprietor.

Trading on his well-honed action-movie persona, Willis delivers a series of tough-guy one-liners throughout. But sorry, “Never f— with a man’s dog!” just doesn’t cut it compared to “Yippee-ki-yay, motherf—er!”

 5/10 genre (action, comedy, and thriller) (I don't know where the comedy part was)

3/10 overall


Thanks for reading this little review and have fun watching movies.

47 METERS DOWN (2017) - REVIEW INCLUDING EXCLUSIVE PREVIEW CLIPS

This review is based on the German version of 47 Meters Down, however I try to explain why this shark movie is great and creating goosebumps and why it is different from all the other shark b-movies, and so here is m review of a movie with a new upcoming Hollywood who is Mandy Moore

47 Meters Down (2017)

 
T
 TRAILER (US VERSION 2)

Two sisters vacationing in Mexico are trapped in a shark cage at the bottom of the ocean. With less than an hour of oxygen left and great white sharks circling nearby, they must fight to survive.

Director:

Stars:

, ,  
 

Official Sites:

| |  »

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

28 June 2017 (Philippines)  »

Also Known As:

In the Deep
 
The film was retitled to "In the Deep" in Spring 2016 and given a VOD/DVD release date of August 2nd through Anchor Bay Entertainment and the Weinstein Co. However, one week before the planned release, the film was bought by Byron Allen's Entertainment Studios, retitled back to "47 Meters Down" and given a wide-release theatrical plan for summer 2017 through Freestyle Releasing.
 
When using an open circuit breathing apparatus as in the film, you breath compressed air, not oxygen. Air is a 79/21% mix of oxygen and nitrogen. At 47 meters down, you'd have very little time as the air inside the tank is compressed further. Rule of thumb is 10m equals an atmospheric pressure, so 10m down you have twice the amount of air, 20m down, half again. 30m down half that again & 40m, half that of 30m. realistically 7minutes. You would also be likely dealing with narcosis which is similar to being drunk, and simple tasks can be difficult to achieve.
 
Two sisters find themselves trapped in a cage at the bottom of the ocean in Johannes Roberts' shark-infested thriller.
Just when you thought it was once again safe to go into the water comes 47 Meters Down, the latest big-screen shark thriller that will make you want to curl up into a fetal position on the beach. Last summer’s surprise hit The Shallows proved that, despite the seemingly monthly arrival of “Shark Week” on the Discovery Channel, moviegoers’ appetite for the fearsome creatures remains unabated. Johannes Roberts’ effective thriller doubles down on its recent predecessor by placing not one but two attractive women in aquatic jeopardy. 

RUSTY CAGE CLIP


The central characters are Lisa (Mandy Moore, whose career has gotten a boost thanks to the hit TV series This is Us) and Kate (Claire Holt, The Vampire Diaries), sisters vacationing together in Mexico. It turns out that Kate was a last-minute substitute for Lisa’s boyfriend, who dumped her just before the trip because he found her too boring. When the two women meet a pair of hunky locals who invite them to go shark-cage diving, Lisa initially resists. But Kate points out that the adventure is just the thing to prove to Lisa’s ex that she’s exciting after all. “Think of the photos!” Kate urges her terrified sister.
 
Lisa has good reason to be scared. The boat skippered by the affable Captain Taylor (Matthew Modine) resembles a bucket of bolts and the rusty cage in which they’ll be dropped into the water looks like it’s held together with duct tape. But they’re only descending five meters and, despite the operation’s seemingly ramshackle nature, the diving equipment, including full-face masks equipped with radio communication, looks state-of-the-art.
 
CAMERA CLIP
 
It isn’t hard to guess what happens next. The cable snaps, sending the cage to the bottom of the ocean floor even as great white sharks, attracted by the chum that had been generously ladled into the water, begin showing up in abundance. The women’s air is quickly running out, but if they try to make a break for it they run the risk of either getting eaten or dying from the bends if they rise to the surface too quickly. They’re only able to communicate with the captain by briefly leaving the cage and ascending a few feet. When the dangers of nitrogen narcosis are added to the mix, it almost seems like overkill.
 
SINKING CLIP
 
The ingeniously simple scenario concocted by director Roberts and his co-screenwriter Ernest Riera (they previously collaborated on the horror film The Other Side of the Door) provides the opportunity for genuine tension abetted by a series of jump scares that are no less effective for being predictable. And while the underwater setting inevitably means that the visuals are often murky and the sound unintelligible, the claustrophobic environment is conveyed in proficiently spooky fashion.
 
Admittedly, the film's dialogue and characterizations are not its strong suit, as evidenced by such moments as when Lisa and Kate take the opportunity to work out some sibling issues during their ordeal. And the endless series of near misses by the ravenous sharks certainly qualifies them as the most inept predators on the planet.
 
NOT SAFE ANYMORE CLIP
 
The camera is always facing on the two girls and if ever something creepy or dangerous comes from outside of the cage we get a quick POV of the girls and so sadly but truly it is not hard to guess what will come or what will happen next. But there are also two nice snapshot with the most important twist in the movie, not telling you when this is going to happen of course.
 
The effects are okay, noting specially invented here to give the shark a special note, but the underwater shoots are great and I love them a lot.
 
The setting is of course not a big surprise and the music is okay, something to dramatic and too loud, so that it is difficult to understand the girls, because they are in the underwater mono sound speaker mode.
 
The movie is a bit too short and the 89 are really passing by quickly, so the action and the fun at the end of the movie, which is again caused of a great twist, made me feel a bit sad because it ended immediately.

But on its own B-movie terms 47 Meters Down works just fine, not wearing out its welcome thanks to its quick set-up, rapid pacing and brief running time. The CGI-rendered sharks are surprisingly convincing, and Holt and Moore do an excellent job of looking terrified throughout. And the surprise twist at the conclusion, while not exactly convincing, provides a suitably nasty jolt which I liked still and convinced me when I look at the big picture, not only to have a nice end and to leave the cinema with the feeling wow that was awkward what I saw, definitely not.
 

7.5/10 for the genre 

7/10 overall

 
It is better at the end than expected, hope you will agree when you watch it and have a nice underwater experience as well.

Thanks for reading and have a lot of fun while watching movies.
 

WONDER WOMAN (2017) SPECIAL - TOP 8 SCENES FROM THE MOVIE

Before she was Wonder Woman she was Diana, princess of the Amazons, trained warrior. When a pilot crashes and tells of conflict in the outside world, she leaves home to fight a war to end all wars, discovering her full powers and true destiny. 

Due to popular demand I will show you the top 8 of the best movie scenes today.
Happy Wednesday and thanks for 100 great moments on movietown, since this is my 100th post. Enjoy and have fun watching.

Wonder Woman (2017)



Fighting alongside man in a war to end all wars, Diana will discover her full powers and her true destiny.

Read my full review here.

 

Box Office

Budget:

$149.000.000 (estimated)

Opening Weekend:

$103.251.471 (USA) (2 June 2017)

Gross:

$205.002.503 (USA) (9 June 2017)

ALL EYEZ ON ME (2017) - REVIEW

Tells the true and untold story of prolific rapper, actor, poet and activist Tupac Shakur. 

All Eyez on Me (2017)

R | | Biography, Drama, Music | 16 June 2017 (USA)   



Tells the true and untold story of prolific rapper, actor, poet and activist Tupac Shakur. The film follows Shakur from his early days in New York City to his evolution into being one of the world's most recognized and influential voices before his untimely death at the age of 25. Against all odds, Shakur's raw talent, powerful lyrics and revolutionary mind-set propelled him into becoming a cultural icon whose legacy continues to grow long after his passing. ALL EYEZ ON ME stars Kat Graham, Lauren Cohan, Hill Harper, Jamal Woolard, Danai Gurira and Demetrius Shipp Jr. as Tupac Shakur.  


Details

Official Sites:

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

16 June 2017 (USA)  »

Filming Locations:

Company Credits

Production Co:

,
“Legends never die.”
Benny Boom (Next Day Air, 48 Hours to Live), directs an all star cast in All Eyez on Me, delivering an exceptional film about the life of rapper, actor, and activist Tupac Shakur (played by  the talented Demetrius Shipp Jr.). The film features elements of hip-hop music and provides behind the scenes analysis deciphering the hidden messages behind Tupac’s lyrics, including controversial songs such as ‘Brenda’s got a baby.’
 ‘Thug life’ has never been a more accurate summary as the film depicts Tupac’s struggle from early days in New York, emerging on the stage, to selling platinum records and charting number one hits, until his tragic death, at the age of twenty-five. Tupac’s empowering speeches on issues surrounding race, with him being described as a revolutionist and an influential hero, adds to his success in informing white America of the harshness and grim consequences that individuals faced because of race-related issues. 
The film displays Tupac’s rawness as his powerful music portrays America as ‘the biggest gang there is’. Themes that play a crucial role in representing Tupac’s life, include friendship and how famous artists strengthen their ties to each other by looking after each other, especially in the music industry. More so, the film just as much states that if you wrong the people who look after you there will be consequences as well. Dominic L. Santana stars as Suge Knight, who manages Tupac’s music success, and Jamal Woolard plays rap legend Biggie Smalls. Not only do the actors mimic famous rappers’ personalities, but they also look a lot like what the original all star legends did. Tupac also states during the film, “If they kill me, I want the people to have every drop, to know the real story”.

All Eyez On Me illustrates that music is something more and that it speaks to people in various ways. One of these concepts which Tupac marks in his music is that of struggles and gang communities. Tupac reminds his viewers, “A shooting can happen anytime and anywhere”. Just as some are proud of his success, there are people who are jealous and would do anything to eliminate Tupac from the competition. The film reminds viewers of how some individuals were out to ruin Tupac’s image and that he was constantly reminded of the “bullseye on his back” because of race.
The media focusing on Tupac’s private life and the American Vice President disagreeing with what Tupac wanted his music to represent, provided Tupac with “all the tools to destroy himself”. This is a must-see film which documents the talented cultural icon whose legacy continues to grow long after his passing.
But we have to point out some really negative points in that movie, which starts with the fact, that it is too long. We have a movie which is about 140 minutes, 20 or maybe even 30 minutes would have been better.
The emotional parts of Demetriusare not emotional, he is doing too many time the same face and especially in those moments when it comes up to sadness and feelings he is not good. It is not almost the same problem, you have an outstanding actor, he is good in the general performance, but it comes up to catch the audience, almost 50% of the people get lost and this is happening here, I did not like that. Demetrius motheris the opposite of him, wonderful, heart touching and better. This kills that bio-pic.

This all leads to rating of

6/10 genre

5/10 overall

but still good for genre fans. Enjoy this special bio drama from June 16 on in the cinemas.
Thanks for reading and have fun watching movies.

CARS 3 (2017) - REVIEW

Lightning McQueen sets out to prove to a new generation of racers that he's still the best race car in the world. 

Cars 3 (2017)



 

Director:

Writers:

(original story by), (original story by) | 5 more credits »

Stars:

, ,

Details

Official Sites:

| |  »

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

23 August 2017 (Philippines)  »

Also Known As:

Carros 3  »

Filming Locations:

 

Company Credits

Production Co:

,
 
Blindsided by a new generation of blazing-fast racers, the legendary Lightning McQueen is suddenly pushed out of the sport he loves. To get back in the game, he will need the help of an eager young race technician with her own plan to win, inspiration from the late Fabulous Hudson Hornet, and a few unexpected turns. Proving that #95 isn't through yet will test the heart of a champion on Piston Cup Racing's biggest stage!
 
The franchise returns to its core values, with Owen Wilson's Lightning McQueen joined by newcomers Armie Hammer, Nathan Fillion and Cristela Alonzo.
In the wake of the noisy misfire that was 2011’s Cars 2, the Pixar pit crew ran the diagnostics and were able to pinpoint the winning formula of humor, heart and action (along with an added dose of Route 66-informed nostalgia) that made the 2006 original such a sweet ride.
They all make a welcome return in Cars 3, but, while visually dynamic, Lightning McQueen’s newest challenge still feels out of alignment with a languid end result that lacks sufficient forward momentum.
Given the enduring good will generated by the first installment, the franchise, which has to date grossed well over $1 billion and sold countless billions more in four-wheeled merchandise, should expect similarly strong, school’s-out business, even with the picture’s less-than-zippy performance.

Wisely not alluding to his previous espionage-fueled World Grand Prix adventure, Lightning McQueen (again voiced by Owen Wilson), the pride of Rust-eze, returns front-and-center to pole position only to discover a new generation of sleek, state-of-the-art vehicles nipping at his wheels.
He ultimately proves no match for one of them — Jackson Storm (Armie Hammer), who takes Lightning’s title and forces him to reassess his racing future, especially when his longtime sponsor has been purchased by the smarmy Sterling (Nathan Fillion), who views McQueen’s retirement as a merchandise-branding gold mine.

After seeking solace back in Radiator Springs, where he’s eventually spurred on by the words of his gruff late mentor, Doc Hudson (the late Paul Newman, in flashbacks), as well as by girlfriend Sally (Bonnie Hunt) and loyal tow-truck pal Mater (Larry the Cable Guy), McQueen agrees to hi-tech rehab with some guidance from gung-ho race technician Cruz Ramirez (Cristela Alonzo).
Taking the wheel from John Lasseter, who directed the first two films, Brian Fee, who served as a storyboard artist on both, opts for a leisurely, unhurried approach to the pacing, which, while agreeably allowing emphasis on character over action, occasionally gets stuck in neutral.

As in the first film, the themes of youth vs. old age and change vs. heritage once again play a prominent role in the script, credited to Kiel Murray, Bob Peterson and Mike Rich, which does a nice job retaining the warmly regarded original characters (although in much smaller roles) while introducing engaging new ones — most notably Alonzo’s spunky Cruz.
While on the subject of change, over the decade since the first Cars there have been some noticeable shifts on the voice-casting front. Among them, aside from the deaths of Newman, who looms large here, and George Carlin, who originated the character of blissed-out VW van Fillmore (now played by Lloyd Sherr), the voice of McQueen rival Chick Hicks, formerly provided by Michael Keaton, is now handled by Peterson.

Like its predecessors, the film is visually quite splendid and, especially for an animated feature, stirringly well lit, most notably in a racing sequence set along a photo-realistic beach during golden hour and another on a vividly moonlit night.
But despite its many winning characters and good intentions, Cars 3 functions mainly as a tenderly rendered, wish-you-were-here picture postcard to Newman, whose absence, while affectionately noted, ultimately serves as a reminder why Lightning can never truly strike twice.

 So this results in a quiet good rating for the animation genre, meanwhile the overall comparison is not a big surprise.

8/10 genre

6/10 overall

However, mammy and daddy will love and the kids also.
Enjoy the movie in cinemas from August 23, 2017 on.

Thanks for reading and have fun watching movies.

BLACK PANTHER (2018) - TRAILER

Black Panther (2018)

 
 
T'Challa, the new ruler of the advanced kingdom of Wakanda, must defend his land from being torn apart by enemies from outside and inside the country.

Director:

Writers:

(screenplay), (screenplay) | 2 more credits »

Stars:

, ,   
 
After the events of Captain America: Civil War, King T'Challa returns home to the reclusive, technologically advanced African nation of Wakanda to serve as his country's new leader. However, T'Challa soon finds that he is challenged for the throne from factions within his own country. When two foes conspire to destroy Wakanda, the hero known as Black Panther must team up with C.I.A. agent Everett K. Ross and members of the Dora Milaje, Wakanadan special forces, to prevent Wakanda from being dragged into a world war. 
 

WEST OF THE JORDAN RIVER (2017) - CANNES FILM FESTIVAL REVIEW

West of the Jordan River (2017)


Production companies: Nilaya Productions, Agav Films, France Televisions
Director-screenwriter: Amos Gitai
Cinematographers: Oded Kirma, Eitan Hai, Vladimir Truchovski
Editors: Tai Zana, Vincent Schmitt, Yuval Orr
Music: Amit Poznansky
Venue: Cannes Film Festival (Directors Fortnight)
Sales company: Doc & Films International

84 minutes
 
The Israel-Palestine conflict is a recurring theme in Israeli director Amos Gitai’s films, both dramas and documentaries. But rarely has he tackled this seemingly intractable issue as directly as he does in West of the Jordan River. Premiered in the Directors Fortnight at Cannes, Gitai’s latest anguished love letter to his homeland examines hardening attitudes on both sides of the long-running turf war, with Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu openly pushing for new settlements and full military control over the occupied West Bank. Meanwhile, efforts to broker a two-state solution remain stalled.
Clearly weighted towards Gitai's own liberal political stance, but incorporating a range of other views too, West of the Jordan River is a dry and sometimes depressing film, but informative and humane too. Gitai’s respected track record and the prickly, perpetually timely subject matter should guarantee plenty of festival play beyond Cannes, followed by a small-screen afterlife.
The film borrows its subtitle, Field Diary Revisited, and its format from Gitai’s 1982 documentary Field Diary, in which he toured the Israeli-occupied territories with a tiny film crew recording interviews with soldiers, politicians and civilians on all sides of the conflict. That film proved controversial enough for the director to flee the country, spending the next decade exiled in France.
Returning to address the same extremely thorny issue more than three decades later, Gitai mostly shoots in the current flashpoint of Hebron, the second largest urban center in the West Bank and the only Palestinian city with an Israeli settlement at its heart. He conducts formal interviews with journalists, politicians and activists. Most are Israeli liberals, but a couple of right-wing hardliners get into testy exchanges with the director, which only serve to illustrate the unyielding dogmatism that threatens every attempt at political compromise in the region.

More illuminating are the street-level chats that Gitai has with ordinary citizens, some angry, others conciliatory, about their grievances and hopes and suggested solutions for peace. The saddest of these interviewees is a Palestinian schoolboy of around 10 who cheerfully shares his dream of becoming a martyr in the holy war against Israel, which only underscores the depth of extremist indoctrination on both sides. After a failed bid to persuade the boy to choose life over death, a despondent Gitai just walks away.

There are more hopeful signs of progress in West of the Jordan River too, especially when Gitai meets charities and NGOs working against divisive propaganda narratives on either side. Breaking The Silence, a group of disillusioned Israeli military veterans, and the grassroots human rights collective B’Tselem are both dedicated to exposing the harsh reality of life under occupation. Less contentious and more moving is Gitai’s encounter with The Parents Circle, a joint Palestinian-Israeli support group for women who have lost loved ones in the conflict. “It’s easy to talk about peace and reconciliation as long as you can’t see your child’s killer,” says one bereaved mother.

Delicately woven with Amit Poznansky’s twinkly, doleful score, the film is fairly functional in style, but generally absorbing and admirably serious in intent. Gitai uses his archive 1994 interview with murdered peacemaker Yitzhak Rabin as a framing device, including a prophetic warning from the late Israeli prime minister about the rising tide of Islamic fundamentalism. But the documentary ends on a cautiously optimistic note, with scenes of Israelis and Palestinians bonding over backgammon at a culturally mixed carnival event. Inevitably, Gitai offers no new solutions for a political settlement, but he shows us how peaceful co-existence can work at a neighborhood level.


OUT OF COMPETITION
 
Copyright © 2017. MOVIETOWN
Blogger Templates